new2
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by new2 on Mar 31, 2005 17:18:55 GMT -5
The Technical Goals Act
1. The state website shall have a list of citizens, a list of micronations with whom Lavalon has treaties, a list of passed acts, and the texts of the basic laws.
i motion to vote
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 31, 2005 17:30:13 GMT -5
all bills must be debated first.  i motion to debate. |
|
new2
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by new2 on Mar 31, 2005 18:18:04 GMT -5
second.
i thing this act is good because itelaberates on z's act
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 31, 2005 18:44:40 GMT -5
i agree. perhaps we can have a less ambiguous title? State Website Guidelines Act or something?
in point 2, "secretary of technology" implies a department for that. We have a, currently vacent, Office of Technology iunder the Dept of the Interior. I recommend giving that undersecretary the responsibility.
|
|
new2
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by new2 on Mar 31, 2005 20:52:40 GMT -5
0o0, can I be the Undersecretary for technogly?
i dont like the "undersecretary" part, though. could you upgrade it to a secretary position.
i guess i'll have to wait for your response on that before i comment on the legistion...
|
|
|
|
Post by Bartholomew Henzelli on Mar 31, 2005 21:02:25 GMT -5
Secretary is the head of a whole deparment (like state department, department of interior, etc.) and undersecretaries are lower-level functionaries within the departments. It's just order of rank, like King, Noble, Knight, etc. You wouldn't knight someone and call them a King. |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 31, 2005 22:29:37 GMT -5
the president has just appointed Carson and I to run the website... as per Z's law. this makes point 3 moot... unless we want to have the GA approve Carson and I's assignment.
henzelli's right, the bureacrat of the Office of Tech must be Undersecretary, unless the pres or GA wants to make a seperate Dept of Tech.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bartholomew Henzelli on Apr 1, 2005 17:15:21 GMT -5
Our bureaucracy is thick enough as it is. We don't need any more departments.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 1, 2005 17:22:16 GMT -5
especially since we already have the position.
i motion to remove points 2 and 3. point 3 is being taken care of right now: jon, carson, and I are going to tag-team it.. and point 2 would be useless to give 3 people those titles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bartholomew Henzelli on Apr 1, 2005 19:57:56 GMT -5
So basically you want the act to read as follows:
1. The state website shall have a list of citizens, a list of micronations with whom Lavalon has treaties, a list of passed acts, and the texts of the basic laws.
That barely constitutes a resolution. But then, we don't have anything on the books telling us how to do resolutions, so why not make everything an act?
I'll second your motion, for the sake of an easy-to-maneuver bureaucracy.
|
|
|
|
Post by csmith on Apr 8, 2005 15:36:46 GMT -5
I move to amend the title of this bill to be "Technical Goals Act."
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 8, 2005 16:33:47 GMT -5
i second that.
i move to vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by csmith on Apr 8, 2005 18:17:24 GMT -5
Hang on, we need to wait 24 hours for any objections to the amendment.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 8, 2005 21:05:56 GMT -5
oh yeah...
well, will my motion still be on the floor?
|
|
|
|
Post by csmith on Apr 9, 2005 4:30:30 GMT -5
Yes.
|
|
