|
|
Post by Xon on Dec 3, 2004 14:32:33 GMT -5
Thank you, "conspirators" Zac and Nate, for putting me into the "undecided" column as well. I'll go ahead and let you in on who you're up against: Henzelli. Polls indicate 3-to-1 and 1 undecided (me). What will make the difference?
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 3, 2004 15:39:43 GMT -5
What are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Dec 3, 2004 16:14:51 GMT -5
First of all, Zach and I conspiring is entirely false. I had no clue he would resign as suddenly as he did. In fact, i read his nomination post before his resignation post. I though he was merely offering his support for Tasneem in the upcoming election of January 5, and that he would not seek reelection then.
And what of these polls? Where do u get your figures?
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 3, 2004 16:16:14 GMT -5
First of all, Zach and I conspiring is entirely false. I had no clue he would resign as suddenly as he did. In fact, i read his nomination post before his resignation post. I though he was merely offering his support for Tasneem in the upcoming election of January 5, and that he would not seek reelection then. That's funny cause I did the same thing! |
|
|
|
Post by ZacharyKlaas on Dec 3, 2004 16:22:08 GMT -5
It's not a conspiracy, Xon. It's called a "campaign". They have them in democracies.  |
|
|
|
Post by timjr on Dec 3, 2004 17:24:41 GMT -5
Of course! Why did I put "conspirators" in quotation marks? Because I was joking!
Nice plan you've all hatched. Tasneem is a formidible candidate simply because she's not Henzelli, Klaas, or me. Get this Citizenship Act passed as soon as you can, and the chance that I could bring in friend-citizens from real-life to vote my favored candidate into office would be diminished. So hurry....
About this polling business:
I have identified a consistent political faction, which has existed more or less as a bloc for several months: CKS: The Chowdhury-Klaas-Shepard Bloc. Now occasionally one of the three votes independently, but mostly they vote the same. Henzelli, I, and several others are politically opposed but we are united in the fact that we do not belong to the CKS bloc. So, it's the CKS and "everyone else", here in Lavalon. The problem is, "everyone else" keeps getting smaller and smaller. CKS took true control after "Emperor Zachary" stopped voting with the APK/UCP party. And then he left Lavalon completely, it seems.
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 3, 2004 18:20:57 GMT -5
Tasneem is a formidible candidate simply because she's not Henzelli, Klaas, or me. CKS: The Chowdury-Klaas-Shepard Bloc. You spelled my last name wrong. It has an 'h' in it. Unless, you were refering to someone other than me |
|
|
|
Post by timjr on Dec 3, 2004 22:02:52 GMT -5
I apologize, some names are more difficult than others to spell.
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 3, 2004 22:19:33 GMT -5
That's ok, I think it's funny.
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 3, 2004 23:25:49 GMT -5
I know that I'm running, but is xon running as well? Or who else is running for pres?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Christophé on Dec 4, 2004 10:14:47 GMT -5
And I can't run. I like that. That was one of my reasons for adding that to the legislature.
It makes my life a whole lot simpler.
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 4, 2004 22:30:03 GMT -5
Awww, you should run! It would be fun!
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 5, 2004 1:06:57 GMT -5
You said this a while ago... but do I really get a brass ring? |
|
|
|
Post by timjr on Dec 6, 2004 15:58:27 GMT -5
Please remove me from the membership roster of the Progressive Bagelcratican Party. I don't like what's happened to it. It used to be a fun place for laughs and great legislation, and then it became some socialist club for CKS (Chowdhury-Klaas-Shephard).
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Dec 6, 2004 17:03:42 GMT -5
Ouch, you mean it's not a great place for laughs and awesome legislation anymore?
Anyways, the last time I checked, Klaas wasn't a member of the FJBP. He just has a coalition with our party.
|
|
