|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Apr 23, 2005 13:33:33 GMT -5
Motion for Debate.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 23, 2005 14:08:09 GMT -5
second
if we're not rec-warring.... how will we attack? e-weapons? i dont think we have those...
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Apr 23, 2005 14:26:38 GMT -5
Yes, the more serious statement I made was referring to more complex, serious means of war... the only reason I don't like recwars is because for me, they send a message of an uncooperative attitude.
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Apr 23, 2005 15:31:51 GMT -5
Define rec-wars
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Apr 23, 2005 15:42:17 GMT -5
You mean, amend the act to say what rec-wars are, or just tell you? It's sort of like a war-like 'game' with a made up scenario.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 23, 2005 17:14:32 GMT -5
how do recwars send messages of uncooprerative attitudes? nowadays they are purely entertainment. i beleive around 5 years ago they actually played a tangible role in micronations like shireroth and babkha... in fact, that is how they acquired much of their citizens and MCS territory... conquest  |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Apr 23, 2005 17:24:51 GMT -5
They tend to use the word "war."
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 23, 2005 18:46:21 GMT -5
ooo.. i see...
hippie! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Apr 23, 2005 20:32:51 GMT -5
I know what they are... but I think you need to define them in the act since it could be interpreted in various ways
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Apr 23, 2005 21:23:38 GMT -5
Motion for amendment.
Motion for amendment. Second?
|
|
|
|
Post by neem on Apr 23, 2005 21:31:27 GMT -5
So how exactly would you attack anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Apr 23, 2005 22:14:27 GMT -5
Hopefully, we wouldn't have to. This is just a law to keep us out of a bad situation later on... a la Avalonia vs Antica.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 23, 2005 23:33:53 GMT -5
i second the amendment.
well... i guess i cant count on Lavalon to provide some aid for Natopia's war with Shireroth now can i? lol!!
|
|
|
|
Post by csmith on Apr 24, 2005 5:12:50 GMT -5
If no objections are made by 1:33 P.M. E.S.T. today, the amendment shall be considered passed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Apr 24, 2005 13:03:29 GMT -5
Then, by now, it should be passed. I move to vote.
|
|
