|
Post by admin on Feb 2, 2005 20:11:20 GMT -5
I motion for a vote to dissolve this committee in favor of the Office of Technology.
|
|
|
Post by timjr on Feb 2, 2005 21:51:11 GMT -5
I second this motion.
Two things can happen now:
- Chancellor Henzelli can use his powers of the Chancellory to disband this Committee
OR
- We can all vote on this, like any other Act
I prefer the first option, because it's faster.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 2, 2005 21:57:48 GMT -5
What should be done with the threads in the committee?
easy solution: change this board into an Archive and move it to the bottom of the site. we can keep all the stuff and have a dumping ground for old stuff we wanna keep later on.
easier solution: delete it. pick and chose what we need and move it to the Dept of Int.
|
|
|
Post by Bartholomew Henzelli on Feb 2, 2005 22:03:09 GMT -5
I have reviewed the Basic Laws and various Acts passed Presidentially and by the General Assembly, and I can't seem to find where it gives me the power to dissolve the committee by my word alone.
Could someone reference me to it so I can make sure that such an act is legal?
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 2, 2005 22:09:50 GMT -5
i dont see it either....
i vote YES to disband this committee
|
|
|
Post by timjr on Feb 2, 2005 22:17:39 GMT -5
Trust me, the Chancellor has the right to disband committees. It's in none of our current laws, but was mentioned in the older Code of the Assembly. Yet, since I know there would be pointless bickering about how much power the Honorable Henzelli should have it situations such as these, I'm going to take the longer route and, like Nate,
I vote YEA.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 2, 2005 23:35:06 GMT -5
well, if its in none of our current laws, then the chancellor cant do it.
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Christophé on Feb 3, 2005 12:15:26 GMT -5
YEA.
(But move the threads, please.)
|
|
|
Post by neem on Feb 3, 2005 17:06:21 GMT -5
yes
|
|
|
Post by Bartholomew Henzelli on Feb 3, 2005 20:40:16 GMT -5
I vote YES.
Xon, we've been over this--the grandfather clause failed. None of the old laws have any bearing. Nothing was grandfathered in.
|
|
|
Post by timjr on Feb 4, 2005 8:04:39 GMT -5
Okay. What about "precedence", though?
Would the ability to open and close committees not be a cool thing for you to be able to do?
|
|
|
Post by Bartholomew Henzelli on Feb 4, 2005 18:22:19 GMT -5
It would be cool, but I don't have that power....despite my love of power.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 4, 2005 18:46:37 GMT -5
the chancellor should have the power to open committees, but the committee itself should close it. or at least the Chairman of the committee as he would have an interest in keeping it around until it has served its purpose. The chancellor may not be aware of the particulars and assume its business is over and close it out of ignorance.
|
|
|
Post by timjr on Feb 4, 2005 18:58:43 GMT -5
Wise precedent. Sounds good.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 4, 2005 21:50:02 GMT -5
actually, id rather it be laid out in the rules of order than just precedent.
|
|